Let the Trade Drama Begin..., Ben Gordon a NY Knick????? |
Let the Trade Drama Begin..., Ben Gordon a NY Knick????? |
May 15 2006, 06:40 PM
Post
#16
|
|
10 Day Contract Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 14-March 06 From: 78666 Member No.: 54 |
The Post only prints crap like that to give the New Yankers something to hope for, as well as to sell some ink.
Next. |
|
|
May 15 2006, 06:44 PM
Post
#17
|
|
6th Man Group: Members Posts: 681 Joined: 16-March 06 Member No.: 65 |
I say NO!!!!!
Gordon is a great young talent. We need to be patient and not expect a player to be perfect in 2 years in the nba. Also, I dont want any of NY's me first sg's. No thanks! I hope we learned our lesson by trading Elton Brand. |
|
|
May 15 2006, 06:52 PM
Post
#18
|
|
12th Man Group: Members Posts: 138 Joined: 13-March 06 Member No.: 25 |
As far as Gordon being traded, Pax would have to be stupid to do any of those trades. Since we already have an oppurtunity to swap picks with the Knicks(which we will do), we'd essentially be trading Gordon for a bad contract(a hot-headed person too) and our own draft pick(which won't be needed). By the way, it's not feasible simply since you cannot trade draft picks in the same round two years in a row(something the NBA put in the CBA back in 99). Since the Knicks don't have their first next year, they need to have it the following year. Only way the deal would work is if the Bulls traded for another 1st round pick and included it in the deal so the Knicks have a first round pick for 2007.
|
|
|
Guest_The Gladiator_* |
May 15 2006, 09:43 PM
Post
#19
|
Guests |
The Knicks have elite gaurds?
|
|
|
Guest_The Gladiator_* |
May 15 2006, 09:45 PM
Post
#20
|
Guests |
I would defenatley trade gordon but not for trash! who the hell would we even get? It couldnt be crawford, couldnt be Marbury or Francis cuz neither one defends so it has to be Q rich, an overall good defender but no way in hell do I trade Q Rich for Gordon!
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 05:40 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Draft Pick Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 16-May 06 Member No.: 140 |
I heard on comcast that paxson said this rumor was BS
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 08:42 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Rookie Group: Members Posts: 90 Joined: 25-March 06 From: Illinois Member No.: 86 |
Well here we go...peace of mind...
Paxson dismisses N.Y. Gordon story Marlen Garcia May 16, 2006 The Knicks' supposed interest in the Bulls' Ben Gordon was news to Bulls general manager John Paxson on Monday. The New York Post, citing unnamed sources, reported the Knicks and Bulls had held trade discussions involving Gordon. Paxson said he has not spoken to anyone in the Knicks organization since October, when he traded Eddy Curry and Antonio Davis to New York. "There's no interest on the Chicago Bulls' part," Paxson said. "It's a complete fabrication." Copyright © 2006, The Chicago Tribune |
|
|
May 16 2006, 09:32 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Bench Group: Members Posts: 271 Joined: 23-March 06 Member No.: 83 |
good...I don't want any of those rejects from NY.
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 12:34 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Superstar Group: Administrator Posts: 3,914 Joined: 13-March 06 Member No.: 23 |
QUOTE (RememberThe90's @ May 16 2006, 07:25 AM) good...I don't want any of those rejects from NY. The only things people should be getting from the Knicks these days are expiring contracts and draft picks. |
|
|
May 27 2006, 01:18 AM
Post
#25
|
|
NBDL Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 27-May 06 Member No.: 148 |
As much as I love Ben, I think it will help the Bulls out more to trade him and replace him with a bigger SG. Even though Ben is young and has made some big shots, the Bulls need a more consistent scorer and one that can defend other teams bigger guards.
|
|
|
May 27 2006, 01:36 AM
Post
#26
|
|
All-Star Group: Administrator Posts: 2,149 Joined: 12-March 06 Member No.: 3 |
QUOTE (Cubbies4Life @ May 26 2006, 11:11 PM) As much as I love Ben, I think it will help the Bulls out more to trade him and replace him with a bigger SG. Even though Ben is young and has made some big shots, the Bulls need a more consistent scorer and one that can defend other teams bigger guards. I completely agree. |
|
|
May 27 2006, 01:41 AM
Post
#27
|
|
12th Man Group: Forum Moderator Posts: 158 Joined: 14-March 06 Member No.: 55 |
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ May 27 2006, 01:29 AM) I completely agree. Don't agree with him, you'll inflate his ego. He's a good friend of mine that I introduced to the forums, do I get my cut of your earnings now, jas? |
|
|
May 27 2006, 10:05 AM
Post
#28
|
|
All-Star Group: Administrator Posts: 2,149 Joined: 12-March 06 Member No.: 3 |
QUOTE (Rowand44 @ May 26 2006, 11:34 PM) Don't agree with him, you'll inflate his ego. He's a good friend of mine that I introduced to the forums, do I get my cut of your earnings now, jas? Yes....since the site is running at a loss, just mail me a blank check In that case...aside from your buddy liking the Cubs, he's already wiser than you. Afterall, Rowand isn't #44 anymore. Your living in the past man. |
|
|
May 27 2006, 11:20 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Bench Group: Members Posts: 228 Joined: 20-April 06 Member No.: 105 |
Paxson has already said he wont do a deal with Ny. And they can save energy on phone calls. Cause gordon AINT going to ny. Likei said before. He doesnt want marbury or steve, And why trade gordon for crawford when we traded him for harrington
|
|
|
May 27 2006, 12:44 PM
Post
#30
|
|
12th Man Group: Forum Moderator Posts: 158 Joined: 14-March 06 Member No.: 55 |
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ May 27 2006, 09:58 AM) Yes....since the site is running at a loss, just mail me a blank check In that case...aside from your buddy liking the Cubs, he's already wiser than you. Afterall, Rowand isn't #44 anymore. Your living in the past man. I try to be nice to you admins by giving you less work and this is the thanks I get. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 12:06 AM |