Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

TalkBulls Forums _ Bulls Talk _ Teague finally signs

Posted by: Balta1701-B Aug 7 2012, 12:33 PM

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chinews-first-round-pick-teague-sign-20120807,0,1528011.story

QUOTE
When the Bulls signed Kirk Hinrich to a portion of the midlevel exception and Marco Belinelli to the biannual exception, they put themselves in a hard-cap situation of $74.307 million. Thus, negotiations with Teague focused on a first-year salary of less than 120 percent, sources said.

Teague ultimately signed a deal for 100 percent of his slotted salary in the first year, or $857,000, sources said. The following years are expected to be at the 120 percent slotted salary.

The Bulls will now have 13 players under contract. However, with just $758,550 under the hard-cap figure, they do not have enough money to sign a player to the veteran's minimum of $857,000. The Bulls will be paying the luxury tax for the first time in franchise history.

Posted by: dasox24 Aug 7 2012, 02:31 PM

QUOTE (Balta1701-B @ Aug 7 2012, 02:33 PM) *
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/breaking/chinews-first-round-pick-teague-sign-20120807,0,1528011.story

Can't help but feel like we're being cheap on this one, especially when we are one of the most profitable teams in the Association.

Posted by: 2nd_city_saint787 Aug 7 2012, 04:44 PM

QUOTE (dasox24 @ Aug 7 2012, 03:31 PM) *
Can't help but feel like we're being cheap on this one, especially when we are one of the most profitable teams in the Association.


If thats what the pick was slotted at then thats what he should have got.


Posted by: madisonsmadhouse Aug 8 2012, 07:02 AM

QUOTE (2nd_city_saint787 @ Aug 7 2012, 05:44 PM) *
If thats what the pick was slotted at then thats what he should have got.


Except that isn't how teams actually do it

Posted by: Balta1701-B Aug 8 2012, 07:15 AM

QUOTE (madisonsmadhouse @ Aug 8 2012, 09:02 AM) *
Except that isn't how teams actually do it

Depends...just giving everyone 120% of the "slotted amount" means that the real slotted amount is 120% of whatever is on paper.


Posted by: madisonsmadhouse Aug 8 2012, 08:35 AM

QUOTE (Balta1701-B @ Aug 8 2012, 08:15 AM) *
Depends...just giving everyone 120% of the "slotted amount" means that the real slotted amount is 120% of whatever is on paper.


How many times has a player been given less than 120%?

Posted by: Jake Aug 8 2012, 08:52 AM

QUOTE (madisonsmadhouse @ Aug 8 2012, 08:35 AM) *
How many times has a player been given less than 120%?


I believe a recently posted article cited 6 examples, mostly players selected this low but more often "reaches"

Posted by: 2nd_city_saint787 Aug 8 2012, 10:15 AM

Whats the point of a price slot if teams aren't gonna use it?

Posted by: Balta1701-B Aug 8 2012, 12:07 PM

QUOTE (2nd_city_saint787 @ Aug 8 2012, 12:15 PM) *
Whats the point of a price slot if teams aren't gonna use it?

Like I said, the reality of it is "120%" is the actual slot...teams just wanted a right to negotiate on the down side and have it not sound so bad.

Posted by: madisonsmadhouse Aug 8 2012, 12:15 PM

QUOTE (2nd_city_saint787 @ Aug 8 2012, 11:15 AM) *
Whats the point of a price slot if teams aren't gonna use it?


Without knowing exactly how far back this goes, if we are talking about 6 (now 7) guys out of all of these drafts have gotten less than 120%, it is hard to go off of the assumption that 100% of slot is normal. We are talking about something like 95 to 99% of signings coming in at 120% of slot.

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)