IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Scoop Jackson's 7 step plan
DutheDoduhon21
post Jun 23 2009, 11:16 PM
Post #1


Leading Scorer
********

Group: Members
Posts: 1,169
Joined: 5-April 06
Member No.: 99



bulls master plan
QUOTE
Entering the 2009 NBA draft, the Chicago Bulls need to create magic in order to become next year's version of the Orlando Magic (and maybe even next year's Lakers). To do this, they'll have to pull off seven semi-miracles.

The Bulls own the 16th and 26th picks Thursday night. But it's more complex than just whom they will pick. The Bulls must make serious -- but not drastic -- decisions on certain positions, players and strategies. Is it easier said than done? Of course. But it all starts with having a plan in place inside the draft room Thursday. So, Chicago needs to have an ironclad, rock-solid, foolproof plan in effect. In other words, the Bulls can't afford to screw up this draft.

Here's my seven-point plan:

1. Draft DeJuan Blair with the 16th pick.
If the Pitt big man is available, this is the no-brainer of the entire draft (including the Clippers' picking Blake Griffin at No. 1 and the Knicks' picking Steph Curry at No. 8). Blair would be the perfect complement to everything Joakim Noah and Tyrus Thomas aren't inside. Blair is a force on the block. Noah is a warrior, and Thomas is a potential All-Star. Together, they could create the best young, three-headed defensive monster in the NBA. Which, if handled with brilliance, could be the missing piece for Chicago to become the most feared team in the East.

2. Hire Charles Oakley as a special assistant to player development.
For Blair to become the player the Bulls really need, he needs to learn how to play the NBA game the way it used to be played -- before the game went soft. He needs to learn from the sensei. The NBA today is full of players who want to be hard but play like pampered soccer superstars. Under Oakley's tutelage, Blair could become the type of player whom people in the league don't want to go up against. He has all the physical tools, he just needs the right person to bring out the Maurice Lucas in his game. The second the Bulls draft Blair, Oakley needs to be on the payroll.

3. Use the 26th pick in one of these three options:
Option 1: Package No. 26 in a Ben Gordon sign-and-trade deal to be announced July 2.
Option 2: Package the pick in a Luol Deng deal that will be finalized by night's end.
Option 3: Simply select Wayne Ellington with the 26th pick.

The Bulls need to clear up the Ben Gordon situation ASAP.
4. Make an agreement with Gordon before Thursday for him to remain a Bull.
Technically, the Bulls can't offer BG anything before July 1. All the talk is that the Pistons will go at him hard. The Knicks are reportedly in the mix, too. As his first order of business, new Bulls GM Gar Forman needs to conduct a back-alley, off-the-record deal with Gordon, "persuading" him to stay. This needs to be done before the draft so that Chicago can enter Thursday with a sense of stability about its starting lineup.

5. Or make an arrangement with Gordon before draft day so that he agrees to a future sign-and-trade with Houston to get Tracy McGrady to replace him.
The Rockets have proven they might not be a "better" team without McGrady, but they play harder, win more and overachieve without him. The business side of the game will hit the Rockets the same way it's about to hit the Bulls. It's never good business to lose a great player and have nothing to show for it. T-Mac would be the perfect complement to Derrick Rose in veteran leadership, size and skill. Plus, the "chemistry" issue that McGrady had to deal with in Houston would not exist in Chicago. And the Bulls don't lose more than 20 (very necessary!) points a night in the process.

6. At 10:20 p.m. ET, John Paxson needs to put the call in to Steve Kerr.
Pax: "Steve, hey it's me, Pax."

Kerr: "Hey. So you're calling about Amare, I figure."

pax: "No. We had that conversation last season before you fired Terry [Porter]. I know you are trying to keep Amare, so I'm not even going to go down that road with you."

Kerr: "Thanks, man. Because when I saw you name come up on the caller ID, I was skeptical about picking it up because I knew you were calling to try to make a deal with Amare. So, what are you calling for, my friend?"

Pax: "I want to talk to you about Shaquille."

Kerr: "O'Neal?"

Pax: "Unless you have another one on your roster (laughs). See, I heard you say with all this talk about Shaq possibly going to the Cavs that you didn't want to trade him for nothing. Well, I want to offer you something much more than nothing."

Kerr: "Who?"

Pax: "Luol."

Kerr: "You mean, Deng?"

Pax: "Unless there's another one on our roster that you might be interested in (laughs). Yes, Deng. John Salmons kinda threw a wrench in our plans. We had no idea he was going to be this good. So now we don't know what to do with Luol. He's too good to come off the bench, and Salmons is too good to play behind him, and we really can't start both because it will create balance problems for our offense. Now, the way I see it, Deng would be the perfect 3 for you to replace what you lost in Shawn Marion and Boris Diaw. He's a perfect complement to Amare, and he'll take pressure off Grant Hill to carry the small forward position all season long. We'll also throw in Tim Thomas and around $3.5 million in cash."

Kerr: (Quiet)

Pax: "Steve, you still there? Steve?"

Kerr: "John … I'm gonna have to call you back. Stay by the phone. Don't move!"

7. Get everyone's ring size if you can make this the Bulls' 2009-10 roster:
Derrick Rose, Tracy McGrady or Ben Gordon, John Salmons, Tyrus Thomas, Shaquille O'Neal; with a bench of Kirk Hinrich, Joakim Noah, DeJuan Blair, Wayne Ellington, Brad Miller, Anthony Roberson and DeMarcus Nelson.

Like I said, "semi-miracles." But if between Paxson, Forman, owner Jerry Reinsdorf and a little friendly help from Kerr (think Danny Ainge/Kevin McHale in the Kevin Garnett deal), the Bulls can get creative with salary structure and not live in fear of the salary cap, miracles can happen.

Don't trip, it all really could happen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dasox24
post Jun 23 2009, 11:23 PM
Post #2


Starter
*******

Group: Forum Moderator

Posts: 994
Joined: 23-March 06
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 84



I read this earlier and it makes too much sense, which means it won't happen. Ever since I heard the 1st rumors of Shaq being traded, I've been heavily in favor of us making a move for him. He's an expiring contract who can still play well down low, particularly offensively where we need it most. A nice bridge to 2010 when we have a serious chance to add a young big man. Blair and Shaq down low sounds great to me.

Btw, I'm talking about the draft Blair and trade for Shaq parts. The rest I don't care about...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZoomSlowik
post Jun 23 2009, 11:31 PM
Post #3


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,704
Joined: 14-March 06
Member No.: 43



8) Rip a hole into an alternate universe where the salary cap doesn't exist so they can acquire McGrady and O'Neal without having to give up Miller or Hinrich to match salaries.

9) Build a time machine to go back to 2004 when Shaq and T-Mac were actually healthy, franchise players capable of being the best players on a championship contender.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rockren
post Jun 23 2009, 11:36 PM
Post #4


6th Man
******

Group: Members
Posts: 585
Joined: 3-May 09
Member No.: 1,947



Someone tell Scoop TMac makes 23 mil next year...

I doubt a sign and trade is doable for BG unless Miller is involved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SoxFan1
post Jun 23 2009, 11:44 PM
Post #5


Superstar
***********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 3,736
Joined: 12-March 06
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 12



Blair/Mullens at 16 and Ellington at 26. Yes please.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rockren
post Jun 23 2009, 11:54 PM
Post #6


6th Man
******

Group: Members
Posts: 585
Joined: 3-May 09
Member No.: 1,947



QUOTE (ZoomSlowik @ Jun 23 2009, 11:31 PM) *
8) Rip a hole into an alternate universe where the salary cap doesn't exist so they can acquire McGrady and O'Neal without having to give up Miller or Hinrich to match salaries.

9) Build a time machine to go back to 2004 when Shaq and T-Mac were actually healthy, franchise players capable of being the best players on a championship contender.


LOL.

I believe the Shaq deal could happen if Kerr makes another poor move. The T-Mac move is just stupid.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZoomSlowik
post Jun 24 2009, 12:04 AM
Post #7


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,704
Joined: 14-March 06
Member No.: 43



QUOTE (rockren @ Jun 24 2009, 12:54 AM) *
LOL.

I believe the Shaq deal could happen if Kerr makes another poor move. The T-Mac move is just stupid.


They definitely have plenty of pieces to move to match a large salary, even two of them if they move every "expendable" contract. However, two of the major ones were still on the roster in that scenario, making the deal impossible. Gordon would be under base-year compensation status in a sign-and-trade, making it nowhere near enough to match salaries with T-Mac. Plus that would require the Bulls going WELL into the luxury tax, which simply isn't realistic. The T-Mac part of the idea was completely asanine, the only benefit that would give the Bulls is a HUGE expiring 2010 deal if they bite the bullet in the short term.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Steve9347
post Jun 24 2009, 09:50 AM
Post #8


I'm fresh.
********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 1,300
Joined: 4-May 06
From: Lombard, IL
Member No.: 131



He needs to pick one of T-Mac or Shaq. All of these ideas have been discussed ad-nauseum by myself and Edwin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Balta1701-B
post Jun 24 2009, 10:40 AM
Post #9


Superstar
***********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 3,914
Joined: 13-March 06
Member No.: 23



You know what really bothers me about the effort to trade Deng? It's not that I don't understand it...it's that 75% of it stems from the fact that our owner won't pay the luxury tax.

We already have the pieces to make a move for a Bosh in a trade if we want while at the same time extending Gordon...we'd just have to go in to tax territory to do it. Blah.

I still don't want to give up on Deng.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Steve9347
post Jun 24 2009, 11:23 AM
Post #10


I'm fresh.
********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 1,300
Joined: 4-May 06
From: Lombard, IL
Member No.: 131



QUOTE (Balta1701-B @ Jun 24 2009, 11:40 AM) *
You know what really bothers me about the effort to trade Deng? It's not that I don't understand it...it's that 75% of it stems from the fact that our owner won't pay the luxury tax.

We already have the pieces to make a move for a Bosh in a trade if we want while at the same time extending Gordon...we'd just have to go in to tax territory to do it. Blah.

I still don't want to give up on Deng.

I have no problem moving Deng... it's time. I still, however, am pissed off that the owner won't approve luxury tax as well. We sell out every game, the other major market teams have no problem... he has no problem trying to save a dying Phoenix, Arizona hockey team (something that shouldn't exist to begin with) and no problem going after Peavy... but with the Bulls, he's a pansy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wanne
post Jun 24 2009, 12:16 PM
Post #11


6th Man
******

Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 15-March 06
Member No.: 61



QUOTE (steve9347 @ Jun 24 2009, 11:23 AM) *
I have no problem moving Deng... it's time. I still, however, am pissed off that the owner won't approve luxury tax as well. We sell out every game, the other major market teams have no problem... he has no problem trying to save a dying Phoenix, Arizona hockey team (something that shouldn't exist to begin with) and no problem going after Peavy... but with the Bulls, he's a pansy.


^^^^^^^^^
what steve said....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
soxfan3530
post Jun 24 2009, 01:33 PM
Post #12


Bench
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 338
Joined: 28-November 06
Member No.: 392



T-Mac??? Seriously???/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chisoxfn
post Jun 24 2009, 04:38 PM
Post #13


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,149
Joined: 12-March 06
Member No.: 3



I have zero interest in Tmac but the Shaqille thing makes a whole hell of a lot of sense.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 09:24 AM
Home | Home | Home | Home | Home