Tyrus v Lamarcus, Did we make the right choice? |
Tyrus v Lamarcus, Did we make the right choice? |
Mar 29 2007, 10:39 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Superstar Group: Members Posts: 3,150 Joined: 20-March 06 Member No.: 73 |
Ok, Im calling it, a Tyrus v Lamarcus thread just for discussion. Do you think we still made the right choice with Tyrus? Or do you think we should have kept Lamarcus?
Right now Tyrus is averaging 4.6 ppg 3.4 rpg and 1.1 bpg Right now Lamarcus is averaging 9.1 ppg 5.0 rpg and 1.2 bpg It looks as though Lamarcus may have been the better choice by those stats but I beg to differ. Right now I would say Aldridge might help us a tad bit more than Tyrus could because of his low post scoring ability and his 6'10 frame but Tyrus ever since allstar break has definitely grown up and has shown signs of becoming the player I had invisioned later on in his career. In terms of blocking shots, Tyrus is among the top 5 in blocks per 48 minutes but his offensive game is not great right now. The only reason Lamarcus is averaging more points is because he is starting and playing considerably more minutes per game than Tyrus Thomas. In the future I see Tyrus blowing by Lamarcus Aldridge because he is the more physical of the two and if he can just get stronger he will be unstoppable with a low post game. IMO Tyrus's cieling is around 20 ppg 12 rpg 3-4 bpg and 2 apg Thats about what I'd say is his Maximum potential. This is what I feel is like Aldridge's cieling. 21 ppg 10 rpg 2 bpg 3 apg Pretty close but like I said, I think Tyrus can surpass him within 2-3 years, we won't even be having this discussion after both there careers are over. But going back to the question, would you rather have Aldridge or Tyrus for the future? |
|
|
Mar 29 2007, 11:10 PM
Post
#2
|
|
All-Star Group: Administrator Posts: 2,704 Joined: 14-March 06 Member No.: 43 |
Wow, you need to put down the Tyrus kool-aid. Kareem and Hakeem are about the only guys EVER to do that for more than one season (well, and probably Wilt, they didn't keep track of blocks back then). He has potential, but that's like Top-50 player ever level. Even his rebounding and block numbers are high in that scenario, and those are his strengths. I would expect something more like Tyson Chandler for the near future, or at least until he shows some kind of ability to consistently create his own shot.
Aldridge has been damn good of late, averging 16.4 points, 8.5 rebounds and 1.69 blocks this month while shooting almost 54%. Yeah, playing time is a factor, but you still have to earn it. Also, realistically with Nocioni out their potential for minutes isn't really that different. Don't get me wrong, Tyrus looks better than I expected, but Aldridge appears to be much farther along at this point, which makes him a safer bet while still having a solid ceiling (which is I believe what I said leading up to the draft). Yes, it's still WAY too early to make any conclusions, but Aldridge looks like the early leader (and on a side note, Brandon Roy was an absolute steal). However, maybe in 3 years Tyrus is another Shawn Marion while Aldridge is more like Drew Gooden, it's hard to say when both guys are fairly raw. |
|
|
Mar 30 2007, 01:54 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Superstar Group: Members Posts: 3,150 Joined: 20-March 06 Member No.: 73 |
Wow, you need to put down the Tyrus kool-aid. Kareem and Hakeem are about the only guys EVER to do that for more than one season (well, and probably Wilt, they didn't keep track of blocks back then). He has potential, but that's like Top-50 player ever level. Even his rebounding and block numbers are high in that scenario, and those are his strengths. I would expect something more like Tyson Chandler for the near future, or at least until he shows some kind of ability to consistently create his own shot. Aldridge has been damn good of late, averging 16.4 points, 8.5 rebounds and 1.69 blocks this month while shooting almost 54%. Yeah, playing time is a factor, but you still have to earn it. Also, realistically with Nocioni out their potential for minutes isn't really that different. Don't get me wrong, Tyrus looks better than I expected, but Aldridge appears to be much farther along at this point, which makes him a safer bet while still having a solid ceiling (which is I believe what I said leading up to the draft). Yes, it's still WAY too early to make any conclusions, but Aldridge looks like the early leader (and on a side note, Brandon Roy was an absolute steal). However, maybe in 3 years Tyrus is another Shawn Marion while Aldridge is more like Drew Gooden, it's hard to say when both guys are fairly raw. I don't understand why 20 and 12 is not feasable for Tyrus as his max potential. Just because I threw this number out there doesnt mean he will average that throughout his career. Kevin Garnet is averaging 23 ppg and 13 rpg so I don't understand your point. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 11:37 AM |