IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> AI Traded to the Nuggets
madisonsmadhouse
post Dec 11 2006, 10:38 AM
Post #16


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,568
Joined: 13-March 06
From: Michigan City, IN
Member No.: 21



Iverson wouldn't be a good fit for us. The back court is already strong in Chicago, and if we are going to pay what it would take to bring a guy like that here, he had better be at least 6'10" not 5'10"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
madisonsmadhouse
post Dec 12 2006, 10:23 AM
Post #17


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,568
Joined: 13-March 06
From: Michigan City, IN
Member No.: 21



QUOTE
Chicago could send the expiring contracts of forwards P.J. Brown and Michael Sweetney, with guard Ben Gordon and a first-round pick to Philly for Allen Iverson. Their brass will meet today but appear unlikely to make such a move.
-- Philadelphia Inquirer


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/scor...ex.html?cnn=yes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RememberThe90's
post Dec 12 2006, 10:32 AM
Post #18


Bench
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 271
Joined: 23-March 06
Member No.: 83



How about this:

Bulls get: Q Richardson
Knicks get: AI
Sixers get: Ben Gordon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
madisonsmadhouse
post Dec 12 2006, 10:37 AM
Post #19


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,568
Joined: 13-March 06
From: Michigan City, IN
Member No.: 21



It wouldn't work because of $$$$

Also a deal to Charlotte fell apart... It looks like MJ is trying to make a BIG splash.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/6264404

QUOTE
Philadelphia 76ers star guard Allen Iverson shot down a trade that would have sent him to the Charlotte Bobcats, according to a Philadelphia Inquirer report.

The newspaper, citing an unnamed source, said the team nearly sent Iverson to Charlotte for a "package of players" on Monday afternoon.
BlogJam ...

Allen Iverson wants a trade. And Mike Kahn has come up with four likely trading partners for the 76ers. Which one do you think makes the most sense? Or should Philly hold onto its disgruntled superstar? Here's your chance to voice your opinion.

But Iverson apparently voiced his displeasure about the possibility of playing for the Bobcats, the Southeast Division's last-place team.

And the deal died.

But at least on a couple of fronts, a deal to Charlotte would have made sense.

The Bobcats, with roughly $38 million in players' salaries, are reportedly about $15 million under the salary cap of $53.1 million and could make a make a major player acquisition more easily than any other NBA team.

Charlotte has several players with short contracts — and The Philly Inquirer says that is just what the Sixers are looking for as they hope to finally get under the salary cap once Chris Webber's contract expires following the 200708 season.

Who are some of the lower-salaried players the Sixers might want in a potential Iverson deal? Guard Brevin Knight, who makes $4.4 million this season on a contract that expires in 2008; forward Melvin Ely, whose $3.3 million contract ends after this season; forward Othella Harrington (2008, $2.2 million this season); and underrated center Primoz Brezec (2008, $2.75 million this season).

Trading any or all of those players would not rattle the Bobcats' core group of guard Raymond Felton, guard Adam Morrison, forward Sean May or center Emeka Okafor.

Gerald Wallace is a player whom the Sixers might covet. But the 24-year-old guard continues to show signs of improvement on the court, and he is part of Charlotte's core group.

So is there a chance a deal might still happen?

An executive of one team told the newspaper that the Bobcats are in the driver's seat to land Iverson in a trade.

"It's Michael [Jordan]'s deal to turn down," the executive reportedly said, referring to Charlotte's new minority owner.

As for Iverson, nearly all traces of the inactive star were gone from the Wachovia Center on Monday night. His nameplate was removed, his locker was cleaned out, and the pregame lineup video featured none of his dazzling highlights.

But Iverson, still officially with the Sixers, was inactive for the third straight game and probably won't be around when Philadelphia hosts Boston on Wednesday — unless he's playing for the Celtics. King said in an e-mail to The Associated Press on Monday that he would not comment until a deal was done.

Webber, traded to Philly from Sacramento in a blockbuster deal in 2005, said he can understand what Iverson must be going through.

"I've been in that position where I felt I helped make a franchise," Webber said. "He cares about people, he cares about Philly. I know he's hurting about having to leave."

Iverson's not hurting enough to prevent him from requesting a trade last week. Sixers' owner Snider said on Friday the All-Star guard had "probably" played his last game with Philadelphia.

"We are so used to playing with Allen, I think that we have to adjust and make plays," Kyle Korver said.

Sixers' coach Maurice Cheeks was peppered all day with questions about Iverson, but said his only focus was on the players in the locker room and snapping the team's losing streak.

"I'm not here to say how this happened, how that happened," Cheeks said. "We're just going forward with the people we have and we're trying to win games. I think our team has been pretty good through all of this."

Iverson's relationship with Cheeks had deteriorated this season, with Iverson leaving a recent practice reportedly after a blowup with his coach. He skipped a team bowling function later that night, apologized and was fined by the organization.

When the Sixers hired Cheeks in May 2005, Iverson joked he was so elated Cheeks got the job he wanted to kiss him on the mouth. The two formed a close relationship when Cheeks was an assistant coach with the Sixers.

"If you got a problem with Mo Cheeks, there must be something wrong with you," Iverson said at the time.

Cheeks said he would only look back fondly on Iverson's 10-plus seasons with the Sixers.

"I have no hard feelings about Allen, none whatsoever," Cheeks said. "He's been a phenomenal player for 11 years. There have been not many people who can stay as consistent as he has his years in the NBA."

While Cheeks said he had not talked to Iverson, third-year swingman Andre Iguodala - Philly's other A.I. — said he had a brief conversation with his soon-to-be former teammate to see how he was holding up. Iguodala joked he asked to borrow one of Iverson's chains, but didn't talk about all the swirling trade rumors.

"Any time a player who's had a great and successful career in this city, whenever it ends, it's kind of bitter," Iguodala said.

Korver said the Sixers are prepared for a season without Iverson.

"We want it to be over. We just want to move on," he said. "Obviously now Allen is probably going to be traded, or is going to be traded, so we just want to move on and not have to have long interviews after shootaround."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chisoxfn
post Dec 12 2006, 10:41 AM
Post #20


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,149
Joined: 12-March 06
Member No.: 3



I would laugh and laugh and laugh if the Knicks picked up Iverson. What a great Xmas that would be. However on the Bulls front I have negative interest in AI.

AI is an amazing player and a fun player to watch but he will never ever win a championship because he's too hard to play with. Its too hard to compliment him with other guys because Iverson needs the ball in his hands at all times and that sort of play encourages guys to sit around and watch and when your team is consistently doing that it will always stink.


Also if we are going to deal with the Knicks, I'd want to get Frye in any trade. I happen to like Richardson though but I wouldn't trade Ben for him straight up without getting a big back as well. Plus Richardson has a bad contract.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
madisonsmadhouse
post Dec 12 2006, 12:07 PM
Post #21


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,568
Joined: 13-March 06
From: Michigan City, IN
Member No.: 21



The Bulls have no interest in AI, and have not been talking to Philly.... Whew.

QUOTE
Meanwhile, the Bulls reportedly have no interest in Iverson despite an erroneous report that they would offer a package involving Ben Gordon, Michael Sweetney and a draft pick. "I know we're not a team that's in there talking about it," coach Scott Skiles told the Chicago Sun-Times. "I haven't given it a whole lot of thought. Wherever he ends up, he ends up."


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writ...f=si_topstories
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DrunkBomber
post Dec 12 2006, 12:26 PM
Post #22


6th Man
******

Group: Members
Posts: 690
Joined: 15-July 06
From: Elmhurst, IL
Member No.: 214



It seems we have exactly what they are looking for in young talent and a good draft pick but we would have to give away way too much for a guy who would only be around a couple season.s
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tony82087
post Dec 12 2006, 10:41 PM
Post #23


Rookie
***

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 13-March 06
Member No.: 18



The New York Daily News is reporting that a three-team deal involving the Bulls and Warriors may be a possibility for a trade of Allen Iverson.
The Warriors would send power forward Troy Murphy to Chicago as part of a package of players, while the Sixers would get Ben Gordon. The Bulls reportedly don't want Iverson as they fear he and Scott Skiles would clash, which makes sense. Other Bulls mentioned going to Philly in a potential deal have been P.J. Brown and ex-Knick Michael Sweetney, each in the final year of his contract. Interestingly, Troy Murphy is not playing for the Warriors on Tuesday night, giving this rumor some extra intrigue.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SoxFan1
post Dec 12 2006, 10:53 PM
Post #24


Superstar
***********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 3,736
Joined: 12-March 06
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 12



QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Dec 12 2006, 10:34 PM) *
The New York Daily News is reporting that a three-team deal involving the Bulls and Warriors may be a possibility for a trade of Allen Iverson.
The Warriors would send power forward Troy Murphy to Chicago as part of a package of players, while the Sixers would get Ben Gordon. The Bulls reportedly don't want Iverson as they fear he and Scott Skiles would clash, which makes sense. Other Bulls mentioned going to Philly in a potential deal have been P.J. Brown and ex-Knick Michael Sweetney, each in the final year of his contract. Interestingly, Troy Murphy is not playing for the Warriors on Tuesday night, giving this rumor some extra intrigue.

Hmm, I don't know if I'd like that deal. Murphy isn't the type of guy I see the Bulls getting when having to give up Gordon. But then again, I'm not familiar with how he's played this season.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZoomSlowik
post Dec 12 2006, 11:33 PM
Post #25


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,704
Joined: 14-March 06
Member No.: 43



QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Dec 12 2006, 10:46 PM) *
Hmm, I don't know if I'd like that deal. Murphy isn't the type of guy I see the Bulls getting when having to give up Gordon. But then again, I'm not familiar with how he's played this season.


Troy's okay, he's a passable rebounder and a decent shooter. He's not much of a defender though, is kind of soft, and generally has a weak shooting percentage because of his reliance on the jumper (though he's been better this year so far, higher percentage with fewer attempts). His contract is also kind of nasty, it comes out to almost $10 mil a year.

He's not one of my favorite players, but he's a passable big man. I'd like to get a bit more for Gordon though, or at least someone of similar value that has a little more going for him.

I'm not really sure why they'd want Gordon/Iverson anyways, Monta Ellis is a similar player, and they also have Jason Richardson and Mikael Pietrus on the wing (I'd MUCH rather have one of those guys, and Richardson seems to be on the outs so he might be feasible). Davis and Iverson would probably be an absolute nightmare in terms of chemistry/continuity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
madisonsmadhouse
post Dec 13 2006, 09:36 AM
Post #26


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,568
Joined: 13-March 06
From: Michigan City, IN
Member No.: 21



Not that Gordon for Murphy would be a fair trade straight out, but the thing is Murphy gives Bulls something that Ben cannot, and that is a scoring big man. Murphy would be a huge shot in the arm for our front line, where as Ben won't be missed as much because of our depth in the backcourt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SleepyWhiteSox
post Dec 13 2006, 10:57 AM
Post #27


Bench
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 282
Joined: 13-March 06
Member No.: 27



QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 13 2006, 09:29 AM) *
Not that Gordon for Murphy would be a fair trade straight out, but the thing is Murphy gives Bulls something that Ben cannot, and that is a scoring big man. Murphy would be a huge shot in the arm for our front line, where as Ben won't be missed as much because of our depth in the backcourt.


He's not much of a low-post scorer though...I wouldn't want him...

I'm all for trading ben, just for something a little more worthwhile...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DrunkBomber
post Dec 13 2006, 11:59 AM
Post #28


6th Man
******

Group: Members
Posts: 690
Joined: 15-July 06
From: Elmhurst, IL
Member No.: 214



Murphy for Gordon sounds like a terrible trade for us.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
madisonsmadhouse
post Dec 13 2006, 01:07 PM
Post #29


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,568
Joined: 13-March 06
From: Michigan City, IN
Member No.: 21



Well according to the Daily Herald the Murphy stuff is not true.

QUOTE
The Bulls might have interest in Golden State power forward Troy Murphy, but his name has not come up in trade talks, according to a team source.
-- Daily Herald
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TeaLeafReaderII
post Dec 13 2006, 02:41 PM
Post #30


Skills Competitor
*********

Group: Forum Moderator

Posts: 1,675
Joined: 14-March 06
Member No.: 52



The way this O is clicking right now I say no... but if you asked be 2 weeks ago when they were slumping I'd say hell yes. Adding Iverson instantly makes the Bulls contenders... the only question is whether or not they already are contenders. huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 10:43 AM
Home | Home | Home | Home | Home