IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


BFirebird
Posted on: Feb 21 2008, 03:25 PM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


Does anyone know how Hughes contract stacks up with Wallace's?
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #34108 · Replies: 39 · Views: 15,391

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 15 2006, 03:02 AM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


QUOTE (TRU @ Jul 11 2006, 12:13 PM)
Yeah NBA Live is ridiculous with the ratings

They are always really low on rookies...never understood why...even ones everyone knew were going to be great.
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #15410 · Replies: 12 · Views: 3,737

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 9 2006, 02:11 AM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


Wilcox would be a good sign and trade acquisition but depending on the price both in players and contract. I agree that J.R. Smith will probably and hopefully be the one traded. The Sonics do not want to sign Wilcox long term so hopefully we can get him relatively cheaply in terms of players.
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #13708 · Replies: 26 · Views: 9,010

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 9 2006, 02:06 AM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


QUOTE (Powerhouse @ Jul 8 2006, 03:35 PM)
We will never know untill they play a couple years in the NBA.

In my opinion any draft in any sport is a crap shoot. It is hard to measure a player's skill and heart and how that will translate on the professional level.
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #13707 · Replies: 24 · Views: 8,108

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 9 2006, 01:55 AM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


Most.frivolous.lawsuit.ever.
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #13706 · Replies: 32 · Views: 11,162

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 4 2006, 12:08 AM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 3 2006, 11:44 PM)
I will say this, I do really hope there is something else to this deal than us simply getting PJ Brown simply because we are getting reamed in the talent end of things.

Of course I also understand the whole 54 million being left on Chandlers contract over the next 5 years and the value of unloading that.

I like the idea of Brown and wouldn't generally mind JR Smith, but Smith really doesn't fit in here considering the amount of wing players we have and this deal actually hurts us cap wise this year.

Right now we are 5.5 mill under the cap and that gives this team enough to potentially go out and get Pyrzbilla, but maybe thats the ploy, sign Pyrzbilla (if we can) and than move Brown and if we can't get another big we keep Brown for his veteran leadership (plus he's still a solid player, I don't care how old he is).

The reason I mention Pyrzbilla is because i see both him and Chandler being relatively similar players and Pyrzbilla can be had for half of what Tys makes. Although he is a few years older.

The thing I like about this whole trade is getting rid of Chandler's contract...trading bad contract for bad contract and the fact that no matter what the Bulls are only stuck with PJ for 1 year max. Smith is an extra bonus I guess but does not really fit and maybe someone would want him and could get something useful for him.
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #12033 · Replies: 185 · Views: 69,400

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 3 2006, 11:06 PM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


QUOTE (HoofHearted @ Jul 3 2006, 10:50 PM)
I hope to God, if we trade Tyson it's not for geriatric Brown. We could really use Tyson off the bench now for 30 minutes a game between 4 and 5. Seriously, Brown can't even jump to block shots anymore, and has lost more than a few steps, but still there are people who think he adds something to us. "Hey, but he's a leader," so freaking what, we have a coach who does that and Big Ben to keep the young guys in check now. Seriously PJ Brown scores 10 points a game, and his defensive skills have gone basement level. Tyson's offense thrived on having a big guy next to him, and other than his rookie season and the year he had chronic back troubles(when he had that big man), he was scoring at a good pace. Tyson can score 8-12 points a game with an actual big man next to him and take away a few shots with his defense, PJ can score 10 and play spiffy defense, but I guess when someone doesnt like someone they just dont like him. Ill put it simply, trading Tyson for spiff just get his contract off the books in a year we dont need to is straight up retarded.

The reason why the trade would make sense is from a money standpoint. Brown could give us 1 good year of service off the bench and then the Bulls could wash their hands of his salary and Tyson would be the Hornets problem. Sure Tyson is a better player than P.J. but the Bulls can't afford to pay 1/3 of their salary that will score them little points in Tyson and Wallace.

This trade would also free up money for the next year of free agency and help in signing their current stars like Gordon and Deng to long deals.
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #12003 · Replies: 141 · Views: 41,309

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 3 2006, 11:02 PM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


I am BFirebird from Soxtalk...some of you might recognize my name. I joined awhile ago but never posted and have only recently started posting more regularly on Soxtalk.

My real name is Brian and I am 24 from the south suburbs and a graduate of Purdue University. I am going to be attending an animation school this fall and hopefully getting a new job soon as well.

Great day for the Bullies getting Big Ben and hopefully will be able to trade Chandler and his huge contract.
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #12002 · Replies: 189 · Views: 48,439

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 3 2006, 10:49 PM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


QUOTE (2nd_city_saint787 @ Jul 3 2006, 10:06 PM)
i think the question now if this trade does happen is would this be the best bull team of all time, i really think it would be.

That could be one of the most asinine comments ever. Granted this teams has a better bench than the Jordan Era teams, but the fact of the matter is they had Michael Jordan on their team. Those Bull teams rank up with the old Celtic teams as some of the best teams ever in the history of the NBA.
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #11996 · Replies: 84 · Views: 27,117

BFirebird
Posted on: Jul 3 2006, 10:41 PM


NBDL
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 7-April 06
Member No.: 101


Welcome to Chicago Ben!!!
  Forum: Bulls Talk · Post Preview: #11993 · Replies: 141 · Views: 41,309


New Posts  New Replies
No New Posts  No New Replies
Hot topic  Hot Topic (New)
No new  Hot Topic (No New)
Poll  Poll (New)
No new votes  Poll (No New)
Closed  Locked Topic
Moved  Moved Topic
 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 07:22 PM
Home | Home | Home | Home | Home