Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Could this be the 1986 draft all over again?
TalkBulls Forums > Nothing But Net > Bulls Talk
madisonsmadhouse
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...cs-sports-print

QUOTE
Skiles knows risks

Coach Scott Skiles knows better than most the risks of the NBA draft and that's probably why it's unlikely the Bulls will be taking big ones.

"It's why it's not an exact science," said Skiles, who was the third-from-last pick in the first round in 1986 and went on to one of the longest careers of those picked in the round.

That draft was regarded as the worst ever with the most shocking failures in NBA draft history. Only Chuck Person, the best of the top picks, Ron Harper, John Salley and Arvydas Sabonis, who didn't come into the NBA until 1995, played longer than Skiles.

"I thought [knowing me] I was as good as anybody," said Skiles with the 20th anniversary of that draft this month. "But I knew I'd go somewhere between 15 and 25."


Skiles went 22 to Milwaukee. The lottery was a disaster and tragic with No. 2 pick Len Bias dead within a few days of a drug overdose and No. 3 Chris Washburn, No. 6 William Bedford and No. 7 Roy Tarpley all having drug problems. Others having short careers were No. 5 Kenny Walker, the Bulls' Brad Sellers at No. 9, John Williams at No. 12, Dwayne "Pearl" Washington at No. 13, Walter Berry at No. 14 and Maurice Martin at No. 16, playing 422 minutes in his career. Brad Daugherty was the No. 1 pick, by Cleveland.

There was talent, though mostly in the second round with Mark Price, Dennis Rodman, Johnny Newman, Nate McMillan, Kevin Duckworth and Jeff Hornacek.


If 1986 suggests anything for this year, it is to get a basketball player and stop betting on potential.
ZoomSlowik
I wouldn't go quite that far. For one, I seriously doubt that one of the players dies the day after the draft. Second, I'd hope that a good number of the top picks don't have drug problems.

I also don't see the top of this draft being anywhere near as un-productive as the 86 draft. Thomas and O'Bryant have significant bust potential, but I'm pretty confident that Aldridge, Bargnani, Roy, Morrison, and Gay will all be at least decent NBA players.
sport1016
I'd say it's at least a lesson in not drafting for potential in a weak draft.

If this draft is weak, that is a testament to the likelihood of thomas etc reaching their ceilings, Roy is the safest pick at the top. That's the way to go.
SoxFan1
Don't draft Tyrus Thomas, Pax. smile.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2024 Invision Power Services, Inc.