QUOTE (ZoomSlowik @ Jun 29 2006, 06:00 PM)
2 things:
1) Their players are better than ours. Nash is a more productive scorer and is more efficient than Hinrich, and even though our forwards are good, they're not as gifted or productive as Marion and Diaw. They're also deeper than us. They had 6 guys average in double figures and two others over 9 points per game.
2) The Suns are not going to win a title without Amare Stoudemire. The only reason they even made the conference finals is that they got to play the two LA teams instead of San Antonio or Dallas in the second round. We obviously don't have anything close to Amare.
Because of that, I don't see the comparisons working very well, and I'm not too excited about putting several SF's out there (and until Thomas gets up to at least 230, he's a SF for all intensive purposes). Thomas still has a long way to go.
I'm not saying we'll be a Suns type offense, but I think we'll make our own variation of that style and I think you'll see Skiles get guys a lot of minutes and really use this versatility. Remember, we can create a ton of matchup problems for other teams when we got with a lengthy lineup (something we really can put out there with the 3 guys we picked up today).
I like what Pax has done and while it seems we have a lot of wing players, some of these guys can create problems for other teams if we lineup them up at the 4 while some of our wings can line up at the 2 and in Sefolesha's case he can be a point-forward type at times.
And I should mention, very few teams have two legit bigs, so its not a major issue as long as we have one big that can guard, as long as our other big is athletic enough to keep up with them and can box out and do the fundementals we'll be just fine.