 Lamarcus Going to the Bulls? Update! |
  |
 Jun 28 2006, 01:58 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
All-Star  Group: Administrator Posts: 2,149 Joined: 12-March 06 Member No.: 3  |
QUOTE (The Gladiator @ Jun 28 2006, 11:51 AM) Well we know for sure that Toronto is taking Bargnani. Reports on Radio and im sure there are reports on the web somewhere. That leaves us with Tyrus Or Lamarcus? I think Roy is out of the question now IMO. Nothing is for sure until its announced and done and they suit up with the respected teams, but it looks that way. If Bargs slides to 2 I think Paxson takes him though. |
 |
 
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:00 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Bench Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 13-March 06 From: Scottsdale, AZ Member No.: 24 |
QUOTE (erw9z3 @ Jun 28 2006, 01:49 PM) No team has ever worried about Chandler on offense. Aldridge would be the only concern. Tyson's offense benefitted A LOT from having Curry draw bigger men off him, when he was against smaller players he was good in 04-05. If they comp decides to guard him with their biggest man, then he wont be available to guard Lamarcus, and if he guards Lamarcus I am confident Tyson can work on the smaller player. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:02 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Superstar Group: Administrator Posts: 3,736 Joined: 12-March 06 From: Chicago, IL Member No.: 12 |
If we draft Lamarcus and sign an offensive threat like Drew Gooden or Al Harrington, I will be very happy.
Basically, nothing but good things come from drafting Aldridge. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:02 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
All-Star Group: Administrator Posts: 2,704 Joined: 14-March 06 Member No.: 43 |
QUOTE (erw9z3 @ Jun 28 2006, 01:47 PM) Aldridge's bulk really doesn't bother me, but what does bother me is the way that he disappeared for strectches during games. I hope it was just that Texas, for one reason or another didn't get him the ball, but a guy with that kind of talent can't disappear offensively. There would be a lot of pressure on him next year too. Chandler doesn't do anything to make other teams worry about him, so he is going to be the one and only thought of all post defenders. The team he was on had something to do with that. He didn't get the ball anywhere near enough. Besides the fact that he was clearly the most talented player on the team, he got fewer shots than P.J. Tucker and Daniel Gibson, getting less than 10.5 shots per game. It wasn't uncommon for him to get single digit shot attempts in a game, which is just unacceptable. His guards didn't help his cause at all, and Rick Barnes apparently didn't drill it into their heads enough that LaMarcus needs to touch the ball every possession. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:02 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
12th Man Group: Members Posts: 100 Joined: 16-March 06 Member No.: 62 |
I like this much better than Thomas. In Pax's last chat on the teams' web site he called Aldridge a versatile 4/ 5. Thomas has versatility as well. But it more of him being a 3 or a 4
|
|
|
|
| Guest_The Gladiator_* |
Jun 28 2006, 02:18 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Guests |
WE ARE LESS THAN 3 HOURS AWAY FOLKS! I CANT WAIT
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:20 PM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Bench Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 13-March 06 From: Scottsdale, AZ Member No.: 24 |
QUOTE (The Gladiator @ Jun 28 2006, 02:11 PM) WE ARE LESS THAN 3 HOURS AWAY FOLKS! I CANT WAIT Doesnt the draft start at 7 CT? |
|
|
|
| Guest_The Gladiator_* |
Jun 28 2006, 02:21 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Guests |
QUOTE (HoofHearted @ Jun 28 2006, 02:13 PM) Doesnt the draft start at 7 CT? No 6!!!! |
|
|
|
| Guest_The Gladiator_* |
Jun 28 2006, 02:22 PM
Post
#39
|
|
Guests |
O yes and might I add that at 9:30 PM CT tune into Comcast Sports net because there running a draft post game show for the BUlls where reporters will be talking to the Bulls Draftees and Mark Schnowski and Stacy King give analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:26 PM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Leading Scorer Group: Members Posts: 1,047 Joined: 12-March 06 Member No.: 4 |
Draft is at 6:30
|
|
|
|
| Guest_The Gladiator_* |
Jun 28 2006, 02:27 PM
Post
#41
|
|
Guests |
QUOTE (WHarris1 @ Jun 28 2006, 02:19 PM) Draft is at 6:30 Is it? I thought it was @ 6 |
|
|
|
| Guest_The Gladiator_* |
Jun 28 2006, 02:28 PM
Post
#42
|
|
Guests |
nvm yep ur right but a Draft Preview is on @ 6. The actual Draft is at 6:30.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:40 PM
Post
#43
|
|
|
10 Day Contract Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 26-June 06 Member No.: 170 |
Ill be happy if they take Aldridge.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 02:41 PM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Starter Group: Global Moderators Posts: 934 Joined: 3-April 06 Member No.: 98 |
If we trade sweets and 16 for Ollie and 13 (presumably to get brewer or carney?) we will look pretty damn formidable as long as we sign ONE big free agent.
Brewer could fall to 13 bc it has been said that a lot of teams in mid to late lottery are just going with best big available (GS, Seatle, NOK) and Orlando, who could pick brewer, is said to be going with redick. Brewer would be there at 13, bc NOK will either take carney or a big at 12. Hinrich/Duhon/Ollie Gordon/Brewer or Carney Deng/Noc Chandler/Aldridge/Songalia Free Agent/Chandler/Malik Allen is a very nice active roster Here's what draft will look like based on new info TOR-Bargs BULLIES-aldridge YES!!!! Charlotte-Gay Portland-Morrison ATL-Williams Minn-Tyrus, where he can become a star sf, bc he is not a pf, no matter what Boston-Foye/Roy Houston-Roy/foye GS-Obryant/simmons Seatle-obryant/simmons Orlando-Redick NOK-Carney/hilton armstrong PHI-we get this pick and take Brewer!!!!!! awesome draft!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Jun 28 2006, 04:32 PM
Post
#45
|
|
|
6th Man Group: Members Posts: 681 Joined: 16-March 06 Member No.: 65 |
I hope this is true!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 07:16 AM |