IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

23 Pages V  « < 11 12 13 14 15 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Official Draft Day Thread, Draft Starts @ 7:30 Eastern Time
dasox24
post Jun 28 2007, 07:14 PM
Post #181


Starter
*******

Group: Forum Moderator

Posts: 994
Joined: 23-March 06
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 84



QUOTE (Bullseye @ Jun 28 2007, 08:06 PM) *
So, let me get this straight. We draft a short Tyson Chandler last year and then trade away Tyson Chandler, only to draft an uglier and worse Tyson Chandler with less potential this year?

Yeah, this makes a ton of sense rolleyes.gif

In the Bulls' defense, if Tyson had had his typical Bulls season this year, no one would be saying a thing about trading him away.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chicago Bulls Fr...
post Jun 28 2007, 07:16 PM
Post #182


Superstar
***********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,150
Joined: 20-March 06
Member No.: 73



QUOTE (Bullseye @ Jun 28 2007, 08:06 PM) *
So, let me get this straight. We draft a short Tyson Chandler last year and then trade away Tyson Chandler, only to draft an uglier and worse Tyson Chandler with less potential this year?

Yeah, this makes a ton of sense rolleyes.gif


Noah vs Chandler are closer comparisons than Tyrus vs Chandler.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bullseye
post Jun 28 2007, 07:18 PM
Post #183


Bench
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 387
Joined: 18-March 06
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 66



QUOTE (Chicago Bulls Franchise @ Jun 28 2007, 08:09 PM) *
Noah vs Chandler are closer comparisons than Tyrus vs Chandler.

I should have put short but with immense potential Tyson.


QUOTE (dasox24 @ Jun 28 2007, 08:07 PM) *
In the Bulls' defense, if Tyson had had his typical Bulls season this year, no one would be saying a thing about trading him away.

I don't even care about the trade. But if you trade him, why draft another player exactly like him?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chicago Bulls Fr...
post Jun 28 2007, 07:22 PM
Post #184


Superstar
***********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,150
Joined: 20-March 06
Member No.: 73



WOW CHanning Frye going to Portland? Wow
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AirScott
post Jun 28 2007, 07:22 PM
Post #185


10 Day Contract
**

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 14-March 06
Member No.: 40



No chance at Randolph.

Gasol?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dasox24
post Jun 28 2007, 07:23 PM
Post #186


Starter
*******

Group: Forum Moderator

Posts: 994
Joined: 23-March 06
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 84



QUOTE (Bullseye @ Jun 28 2007, 08:11 PM) *
I should have put short but with immense potential Tyson.
I don't even care about the trade. But if you trade him, why draft another player exactly like him?

B/c he costs a ton less... And we needed that money to lock up Hinrich, with Deng likely coming this offseason as well as Gordon possibly.

Hahaha, the Knicks are gonna acquire Randolph. Have fun when he's getting busted by the NYPD for marijuana possession or something else like that.

Oh man, I thought the Nets were a lock to take McRoberts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
danman31
post Jun 28 2007, 07:23 PM
Post #187


12th Man
****

Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 22-April 06
Member No.: 107



Don't the Knicks already have Zach Randolph (Curry)?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chicago Bulls Fr...
post Jun 28 2007, 07:25 PM
Post #188


Superstar
***********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,150
Joined: 20-March 06
Member No.: 73



He fits in nicely with the "Thug-like" Knicks. Good trade for the Knicks on paper but Randolphs attitude won't be gone unnoticed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dasox24
post Jun 28 2007, 07:28 PM
Post #189


Starter
*******

Group: Forum Moderator

Posts: 994
Joined: 23-March 06
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 84



QUOTE (Chicago Bulls Franchise @ Jun 28 2007, 08:15 PM) *
WOW CHanning Frye going to Portland? Wow

No kidding. There lineup is so young and good, especially down low. PG and SF are a little weak, but there's no doubt SG, PF, and C are stacked.

PG- Jarret Jack/Sergio Rodriguez
SG- Brandon Roy/I don't know
SF- Martell Webster/Travis Outlaw
PF- LaMarcus Aldridge/Channing Frye
C- Greg Oden/Channing Frye
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chicago Bulls Fr...
post Jun 28 2007, 07:29 PM
Post #190


Superstar
***********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,150
Joined: 20-March 06
Member No.: 73



Ne one else think we might be able to get Frye since he doesn't really fit in with Portland who already has Aldridge?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ChWRoCk2
post Jun 28 2007, 07:29 PM
Post #191


6th Man
******

Group: Members
Posts: 561
Joined: 14-March 06
Member No.: 41



QUOTE (danman31 @ Jun 28 2007, 08:16 PM) *
Don't the Knicks already have Zach Randolph (Curry)?

I really dont get that trade, Curry is their center, and im assuming Randolph plays power forward.

So where does lee play then? He certainly shouldnt have been clapping when he saw this deal.


But for Portland its great because now they have Lamarcus and Oden downlow, and Francis and Roy at guard. Great trade for them and they already have a good bench I guess all they need is a small forward because Oduka isnt much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sport1016
post Jun 28 2007, 07:31 PM
Post #192


Starter
*******

Group: Global Moderators

Posts: 934
Joined: 3-April 06
Member No.: 98



r u kidding me with the knicks trade?

Randolph and Curry are never gonna work

It's exactly why JO and Harrington couldnt play together last year and they had to blow it up. They both play the same way in the same place on the court.

Randolph and Curry will never coexist well. They occupy the same space on the floor. Between the two of them, a swinging gate in the wind would be better defense in the paint.

and doesnt portland need a sf? Isnt that what they wanted to use randolph for? Channing Frye? He's a worse aldridge, right? Isn't Richard Jefferson for ZBo (an earlier rumor) a much better deal for portland?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dasox24
post Jun 28 2007, 07:31 PM
Post #193


Starter
*******

Group: Forum Moderator

Posts: 994
Joined: 23-March 06
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 84



QUOTE (Chicago Bulls Franchise @ Jun 28 2007, 08:22 PM) *
Ne one else think we might be able to get Frye since he doesn't really fit in with Portland who already has Aldridge?

I've always been a big fan of Frye. I wound't mind getting him for maybe Duhon and Noc, who would immediately start at PG and SF for Portland. TT would get more PT at SF to replace Noc, so we'd still have enough minutes to go around for Big Ben, TT, Noah, and Frye. Talk about a much, much improved front court as compared to last year.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bullseye
post Jun 28 2007, 07:33 PM
Post #194


Bench
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 387
Joined: 18-March 06
From: Chicago, IL
Member No.: 66



QUOTE (dasox24 @ Jun 28 2007, 08:21 PM) *
No kidding. There lineup is so young and good, especially down low. PG and SF are a little weak, but there's no doubt SG, PF, and C are stacked.

PG- Jarret Jack/Sergio Rodriguez
SG- Brandon Roy/I don't know
SF- Martell Webster/Travis Outlaw
PF- LaMarcus Aldridge/Channing Frye
C- Greg Oden/Channing Frye

Didn't they get Francis as well, so he would be starting at PG.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chisoxfn
post Jun 28 2007, 07:33 PM
Post #195


All-Star
**********

Group: Administrator

Posts: 2,149
Joined: 12-March 06
Member No.: 3



I wonder if the Bulls will try moving up to get Jason Smith. I know they are very high on him and he could really give the Bulls some parts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

23 Pages V  « < 11 12 13 14 15 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 04:12 PM
Home | Home | Home | Home | Home